Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:21

Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What can we learn from the fatal shooting of UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
F1's Canadian GP will clash with the Indy 500 every five years - Motorsport.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why did my ex-narcissist move so fast with his new supply marriage engagement moving in, etc.?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Dark matter 'lampshades' dimming stars could solve one of the greatest scientific mysteries - Space
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What Wilson said about Logan Gilbert’s second rehab start - Seattle Sports
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Is Beehiiv better than Substack?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?